While bandwidth may not be a concern to you, it is to me. I live in the foothills,,. no DSL No cable just a modem at 31.2Kb at best. Dick At 8:34 PM -0400 4/24/01, Dave wrote: >Agree with you, HTML email is the way to go. We send multipart text/html and >also the html-commented bit as per last weeks thread on the subject. >Bandwidth is no longer the concern it was last year (or was it the year >before?) > >(But I think Netscape is closest so far to meeting w3c "standard") ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
- RE: slightly OT: html formatted e-mails zac
- Re: slightly OT: html formatted e-mails Howie Hamlin
- RE: slightly OT: html formatted e-mails John Fix 3rd
- Re: slightly OT: html formatted e-mails Michael Lugassy
- Re: slightly OT: html formatted e-ma... Jon Hall
- Re: slightly OT: html formatted e-ma... Dick Applebaum
- Re: slightly OT: html formatted ... Michael Lugassy
- RE: slightly OT: html formatted ... zac
- Re: slightly OT: html formatted ... Dave
- Re: slightly OT: html formatted ... Dick Applebaum
- Re: slightly OT: html formatted ... Michael Lugassy
- Re: more than slightly OT: html ... pan
- RE: slightly OT: html formatted ... zac
- RE: slightly OT: html formatted e-ma... zac
- RE: slightly OT: html formatted e-mails McAtee, Malcolm
- RE: slightly OT: html formatted e-mails Dave Watts

