> http://www-4.ibm.com/software/webservers/appserv/
> http://www.bea.com/products/weblogic/server/index.shtml
> http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/guide/server/features/application.asp
That explains your outlook a bit. Based on Macromedia/Allaire statements
since the merger, MS is the only one from that list that targets the same
market that CF is aimed at. Functionality, of course, is similar amongst
them all with each having it's own strength. BEA and IBM solutions both
carry higher price tags just to get in the door without even considering the
cost/time to actually deliver a completed solution. Vendor support in each
case varies widely. And I can't remember the last time I saw a hosting
provider that offered shared hosting services with BEA or WebSphere...there
must be a few somewhere. I would also question the "more widely deployed"
and "more experienced" aspects of your concerns when comparing CF to each of
these. (ASP being more widely deployed since you get it with NT whether you
want it or not, of course).
Ken
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
