IBM has moved away from Net.Data in their own WebSphere products. I would
take this to mean that there's not much future with it. On the other hand,
there are probably quite a few older systems out there that used it. So,
from the standpoint of working with older/other systems it's probably good
but I certainly wouldn't create anything new with unless existing
hardware/software requires it.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bernd VanSkiver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 9:50 AM
Subject: Net.Data vs CF
> Anyone here use IBM's Net.Data language? I have been
> asked to learn it where I am working and will get a
> substantial raise if I do. I have been getting myself
> introduced with it and cannot see any advantages with
> it over ColdFusion. Our company already has some code
> written in Net.Data, I figure I'll learn it, get the
> raise and then convert everything to CF unless there
> is some reason to keep it in Net.Data. Net.Data seems
> quite complicated and long compared to ColdFusion.
>
> =====
> Bernd VanSkiver
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ColdFusion Developer
> ICQ UIN: 916324
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
