Aight, thanx...usually not a good sign for the future
of a language when its creator has stopped using it.
--- Ken Monroe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IBM has moved away from Net.Data in their own
> WebSphere products. I would
> take this to mean that there's not much future with
> it. On the other hand,
> there are probably quite a few older systems out
> there that used it. So,
> from the standpoint of working with older/other
> systems it's probably good
> but I certainly wouldn't create anything new with
> unless existing
> hardware/software requires it.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bernd VanSkiver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 9:50 AM
> Subject: Net.Data vs CF
>
>
> > Anyone here use IBM's Net.Data language? I have
> been
> > asked to learn it where I am working and will get
> a
> > substantial raise if I do. I have been getting
> myself
> > introduced with it and cannot see any advantages
> with
> > it over ColdFusion. Our company already has some
> code
> > written in Net.Data, I figure I'll learn it, get
> the
> > raise and then convert everything to CF unless
> there
> > is some reason to keep it in Net.Data. Net.Data
> seems
> > quite complicated and long compared to ColdFusion.
> >
> > =====
> > Bernd VanSkiver
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > ColdFusion Developer
> > ICQ UIN: 916324
> >
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
