I think that the review is a little dated -- as far as I know, there is no
<CFSQL> tag -- it was just incorporated as part of CFQUERY .
It does seem to fly much faster on my local machine, fwiw.
There is a performance brief on Macromedia's site that explains how they got
the figure.
http://www.macromedia.com/software/coldfusion/productinfo/performance_brief/
cf5_perf_brief.pdf
Tim P.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 9:39 AM
Subject: Re: Review: CF 5.0
I particularly find this interesting:
On Windows 2000, Macromedia benchmarks indicate that ColdFusion
Server 5 processes page requests up to 5 times faster than ColdFusion
Server 4.5.1.
Anyone have any real life experiences on how much faster it REALLY
is? How about on NT?
--
Bud Schneehagen - Tropical Web Creations
_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
ColdFusion Solutions / eCommerce Development
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.twcreations.com/
954.721.3452
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
