I think if a company benchmarks its own products, you can
rest assured that the results will be somewhat skewed :)
Norman
Quoting Edward Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm of the opinion that Macromedia cooked the
> benchmark results to get
> what they wanted. Either that, or I'm reading them
> wrong. Macromedia's
> benchmark document is here:
>
>
http://www.macromedia.com/software/coldfusion/productinfo/pe
rformance_brief/cf5_perf_brief.pdf
>
> Please check out page 12 of the PDF.
>
> In the table of settings, note that Macromedia set
> the 4.5 server to 1
> thread per cpu. This is contrary to their own 4.5
> tuning specs, and
> certainly nothing any of us would do on a production
> server
> ('simultaneous requests' in the table). Am I
> reading this wrong? On
> the 5.0 server, they set to 4 threads per cpu.
>
> I find it hard to believe that they would skew their
> testing so
> obviously, but I can't find any other conclusion.
>
> Comments?
>
> Bud wrote:
> >
> > I particularly find this interesting:
> >
> > On Windows 2000, Macromedia benchmarks indicate
> that ColdFusion
> > Server 5 processes page requests up to 5 times
> faster than ColdFusion
> > Server 4.5.1.
> >
> > Anyone have any real life experiences on how much
> faster it REALLY
> > is? How about on NT?
> > --
> >
> > Bud Schneehagen - Tropical Web Creations
> >
> > _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
> > ColdFusion Solutions / eCommerce Development
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://www.twcreations.com/
> > 954.721.3452
> >
> >
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
