I've known Raymond for a while and I've never seen a chip. I actually have
the same stance when it comes to decrypting templates and while I do supply
docs on the hidden functions, they're still officially hidden.
At 08:10 AM 8/28/01, you wrote:
> > Is it just me, or does it seem like Raymond almost has a chip on his
> > shoulder? Every response in this thread he seems agitated or defensive
> > about something...
>
>Sorry, but what about what I said below is rude? The only time I've gotten
>agitated here is when people were advocating decrypting templates, and hey,
>we all have things we get agitated about. ;) Again, though, I don't see
>where I was rude below, but if I was, I apologize. Just trying to help.
>(Although, I _still_ say it is a mistake to use unofficial functions and
>then complain about it, but the original poster said this wasn't his
>choice.)
>
>-Ray
>
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 5:07 PM
> > > To: CF-Talk
> > > Subject: RE: Encryption differences in ColdFusion 4.5 and 5.0?
> > >
> > >
> > > > > So, the problems were with the unofficial funcs? If so, I'm
> > not going
> > > > to
> > > > > worry about them. Again, if you don't use the official
> > funcs, you reap
> > > > what
> > > > > you sow. ;)
>
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
