Dear Friend,
You words really mean it.I really appreciate your thinking. Rgds Nagaraj ----- Original Message ----- From: "Billy Cravens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 9:01 PM Subject: RE: Networksolutions using CFM > Keep in mind that purchasing decisions are typically made by management, > not developers. And there are a lot of companies that use PHP and Perl. > And yes, they are very powerful and free. I don't care for Perl > personally, but PHP is quite a cool little language. > > Why do people buy CF? 1) ROI and 2)support > > Blah. I hate languageX vs languageY stuff. I say learn it all, and > pick the best one for the situation. Once you've learned one web > language, anyone with a handful of braincells can EASILY pick up another > one (unless you allow yourself to be convinced that the language you > "love" is the only one worth learning) > > --- > Billy Cravens > Web Development, EDS > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tony Hicks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 6:11 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: Networksolutions using CFM > > > One thing you can't do with Cold Fusion is convince people of the > language's strength.. > > <cf_moron problem="ignorance" NumberOfTimesToTryExplaining="50" > IfNegativeResults="You'll see."> > > I've only gotten one php developer to migrate to Cold Fusion.. Here's > the question I ask of developers.. IF PHP and Perl are so powerful and > free then why does anyone buy Cold Fusion? And doesn't it seem like it > would be the toy developers who would use the free languages? > > Oh, my boss would have loved having Cold Fusion for free, lol.. > > And another thing.. can someone tell me what's so divinely awesome about > JSP?? I've looked at it and I'd rather write <CF..> anyday.. > > And no offense to you guys who believe JSP is better because some of you > are undoubtedly better CFers than me.. but so far the only ones I've > encountered that prefer JSP are the ones who code Cold Fusion literally > like this: > > <cfoutput>#variable1#</cfoutput><cfoutput>#variable2#</cfoutput> > <cfoutput>#variable3#</cfoutput><cfoutput>#variable4#</cfoutput> > <cfoutput>#variable5#</cfoutput><cfoutput>#variable6#</cfoutput> > > Thanks, > Tony Hicks > ---------- > Search the Holy Bible: http://www.bibleclicks.com > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Michael Vinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 4:40 PM > Subject: Re: Networksolutions using CFM > > > > .. sentiments well taken, but for late entrants (like myself) into the > corporate transaction-based world, this is very useful (important) > reading. I'm > > on the cusp of a decision (offer) to move into jsp/oracle/beans/etc. > > ... > from a pretty rewarding 10+ years of building educational multimedia. > The market > > is just a tad too soft & I feel that I have reached a plateau with > > that > other Macromedia product (Director). > > -mv > > > > Billy Cravens wrote: > > > > > I get the feeling this thread is about to digress into a "CF vs. > > > [insert language here]" thread ... Please no... > > > > > > --- > > > Billy Cravens > > > Web Development, EDS > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Brunt, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:35 PM > > > To: CF-Talk > > > Subject: RE: Networksolutions using CFM > > > > > > Since the Verisign thing the new (netsol I think) web site is pretty > > > > aweful and yes it does look like java now. Why oh why can't people > > > be satisfied to use ColdFusion after all this time we are still seen > > > > as toy developers by some. The reality is there is little or > > > nothing you cannot do with CF. > > > > > > Mike Brunt > > > Sempra Energy > > > 213.244.5226 > > > "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many to choose > > > from." > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Dan Phillips [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 1:27 PM > > > To: CF-Talk > > > Subject: RE: Networksolutions using CFM > > > > > > Verisign now owns them...officially anyway. Seems they are using > > > quite a bit of jhtml too. > > > > > > Dan Phillips > > > Lead Support Technician\ColdFusion Administrator > > > Express Technologies, Inc. > > > dba CFXhosting.com > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Chad Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 4:24 PM > > > To: CF-Talk > > > Subject: Networksolutions using CFM > > > > > > I just got an email from Networksolutions and in the email were > > > links to CFM pages. Pretty cool to see Networksolutions using Cold > > > Fusion for some things! > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
