I've used UD and Studio together since UD 1 came out and before that DW and Studio. Personally designing complex table structures from scratch by hand takes way too much time. That's what CF is all about, RAD... I've done some site designs in DW that would never have been possible by hand simply because of the time it would take to perfect a table structure that was extremly complex.
Hopefully after all of the people still using NS4 upgrade, we can finally totally get rid of tables alltogether and use css, but until then, designing a site to look exactly like you want will require complex table design. Take a look at msn or cnn's home page. I'll go out on a limb and say that hand coding either one of those site designs is impossible, and I can guarantee that neither of them were done by hand for sure. Half of the time I dont even save a design in UD though, I just do the design then paste the code into Studio and start refining it. After refining the design if I change my mind and need to change the table structure drastically, I'll just copy back into UD, click a button, then copy back. Unless you follow the Yahoo site design school of thought, a WYSIWYG editor is a necessity imho. jon ----- Original Message ----- From: "Larry Juncker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 5:39 PM Subject: RE: DreamWeaver UltraDev 4 and CF Studio > Thanks - That was kind of what I had come to the conclusion of, Worthless > unless you totally use WYSIWYG > > I like to see what I am coding, so I guess I just stick with Studio. > > I guess I still don't see why they have the link to UD in Studio either, > what purpose does that solve? > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
