Actually, doing complex tables in Studio is a quick and easy process, if you
know how to use Studio and have a clear picture in your mind of what you
want the table to look like.  Check out the table wizard in Studio.  Any
time I need to build a complex table I use it and it's never failed me.

H.



Howard Owens
Internet Operations Coordinator
www.insidevc.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AIM: GoCatGo1956


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brook Davies [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 4:27 PM
> To:   CF-Talk
> Subject:      Re: DreamWeaver UltraDev 4 and CF Studio
> 
> Jon,
> 
> I personally don't agree that a WYSIWYG editor is a necessity for web 
> development. Not at all. In fact, I think it is a crutch for many 
> developers because they never learn a solid foundation and good HTML.
> 
> Designing complex table layouts is easy if you've been practicing and know
> 
> HTML like the back of your hand. I've never met a table that I could not 
> make my bitch.  I hand code almost everything, and consequently have a
> very 
> intimidate (no jokes please) relationship with the resulting code.
> 
> Brook
> 
> 
> At 07:05 PM 16/11/01 -0500, you wrote:
> >I've used UD and Studio together since UD 1 came out and before that DW
> and
> >Studio. Personally designing complex table structures from scratch by
> hand
> >takes way too much time. That's what CF is all about, RAD...
> >I've done some site designs in DW that would never have been possible by
> >hand simply because of the time it would take to perfect a table
> structure
> >that was extremly complex.
> >
> >Hopefully after all of the people still using NS4 upgrade, we can finally
> >totally get rid of tables alltogether and use css, but until then,
> designing
> >a site to look exactly like you want will require complex table design.
> Take
> >a look at msn or cnn's home page. I'll go out on a limb and say that hand
> >coding either one of those site designs is impossible, and I can
> guarantee
> >that neither of them were done by hand for sure.
> >
> >Half of the time I dont even save a design in UD though, I just do the
> >design then paste the code into Studio and start refining it. After
> refining
> >the design if I change my mind and need to change the table structure
> >drastically, I'll just copy back into UD, click a button, then copy back.
> >
> >Unless you follow the Yahoo site design school of thought, a WYSIWYG
> editor
> >is a necessity imho.
> >
> >jon
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Larry Juncker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 5:39 PM
> >Subject: RE: DreamWeaver UltraDev 4 and CF Studio
> >
> >
> > > Thanks - That was kind of what I had come to the conclusion of,
> Worthless
> > > unless you totally use WYSIWYG
> > >
> > > I like to see what I am coding, so I guess I just stick with Studio.
> > >
> > > I guess I still don't see why they have the link to UD in Studio
> either,
> > > what purpose does that solve?
> > >
> >
> >
> 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to