Sure.  If you like component based development, there are much better
platforms to choose from though:  ASP.NET and JSP have much better component
based programming methodologies than fusebox does.  

Look.  Ben Forta is the guru of gurus in CF, and he didn't exactly give it
an endoresement when he came to Vancouver last week.  That's enough for me
to sweep that idea under the rug.  He didn't exactly slag it either, but
anyways, he can probably fill you in more than I can.  As him for more
information.

The bottom line is that Fusebox is a methodology that makes CF development
take more time.  If you want a more time consuming process to develop sites,
than I suggest ASP.NET (when it's rtm) or JSP.

It is a good methdology, though.  I just prefer to use the methodology
appropriate to the situation, rather than use one that could potentially
stonewall me at some point down the road...

-----Original Message-----
From: Joseph DeVore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2001 2:56 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Fusebox - opinions?


Costas Piliotis,

IMO, The Fusebox 3.0 methodology Rocks!
http://fusebox.org

Have you taken the time to read the spec or create any applications? Even
when NEO comes out, not everyone will have the means to upgrade.

No matter which route CF takes, Fusebox makes a better developer! It will
change the way you plan and code your applications even if you don't decide
to use the methodology.

If you take the time to check it out, I'm sure you will agree!

Gyrus, I would encourage you to read the new spec and forget the book and
it's reviews. (The book is old and covers Fusebox 1.0)

If you want to purchase something to help you with Fusebox check out the
'Conference in a Box' from Hal Helms: http://halhelms.com/

CIAO,

Joseph DeVore
VeloxWeb Technologies




-----Original Message-----
From: Costas Piliotis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2001 12:49 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Fusebox - opinions?


Since everyone has put their two pennies in...

Fusebox is a nice idea.  IMHO though, Cold Fusion was never intended for
structured programming in the modern, object oriented terms.  New will have
cf classes and stuff, so fusebox may or may not be the way to go.

Here's the best thing about cold fusion:  It allows developers the
flexibility to design using the methodology they deem appropriate.  There
are no "rules" in cold fusion (other than the cf tags and functions).

I'd check the specs on neo (cf6) and hold off.  Fusebox is a methodology
that may not bode well with the stuff in cf6.  Just suggesting you be
careful.

-----Original Message-----
From: Gyrus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 6:41 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Fusebox - opinions?


OK, I think I'm on the verge of knuckling down and getting friendly with
Fusebox for CF. Glancing through the PPT presentations, it seems pretty
cool, and quite close to the systems I've developed anyway, only better
organised :)

A few questions for everyone out there who uses Fusebox:

1. Pros? Cons? Opinions? I've generally only seen good
    feedback, but I thought I'd see...

2. Is there any good documentation/literature? I think the
    PPT presentations should get me going, but I know I'll
    want something a little meatier. I was going to try out
    the book but it got so-so reader reviews on Amazon.com.
    Anyone think the book's worth it? Alternative deeper
    discussions of Fusebox anywhere?

3. I've not really used PHP or ASP. Does anyone know how
    the moves to have Fusebox work for these is going? Will
    knowing Fusebox in CF help me get going quicker with
    PHP/ASP if/when I delve into them (assuming Fusebox has
    been adapted for them)?

4. Some clients I have are still hosted with CF 4.0 - does this
    pose any problems for using Fusebox 3?

All comments and feedback most welcome :)

- Gyrus





~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to