ok... we have done a Sun implementation using Cisco Local Director
Product... using JSP/Java.. works fairly easily and has some stateful data
exchange... all home rolled... the Cisco products are dated and expensive..
interface doesn't leave you warm and friendly feeling.... the cost is quite
high... and support can be lacking... good if you want to be geeky and waste
lots of time... too much of what we asked for was a let me check sort of
workaround...

We have two Hypeflow load balancing switches we utilize on occasion which
are nice.. 15k per unit original price point... they never let us down...

Experimenting with an appliance from Phobos... nice looking unit with 4
ports... and cross connect for interconnecting several of them... about a
$3500 price point... KISS interface.... looks promising for small client
work...

I did a bunch of comparison shopping about 14 months ago of products...

Like the looks of the F5 devices... they aren't cheap either...Foundry makes
some nice gear and are originally switching people so they get the
throughput and multiple interface and backplane piece real good... Cost is
high like the rest...

We checked out a piece of software from resonate... like a peer to peer
distributed sort of system to control traffic redirection... was per server
cost and there were some voids in places...  seemed interesting enough...

Me personally, I use a series of monitors internal and external to monitor
things and send off notices if something goes offline... We have had 3 or
front ends for a project running... nothing too big... when a bug or problem
is/was detected we pull the DNS entry for the server from the available
pool... if you are creative you can script things to edit the DNS entries in
this case... of course our DNS servers have a 1 minute max lag time... which
might not cut it for your product needs...

Overall, the DNS solution I think is by far the best... unless you have a
compelling story and a nice bankroll to throw at things...  The Phobos unit
is quit nice and performs well... its issue from my end is port density...
Port density is big on my end as I typically wire boxes with quad cards to
multiple switches.. lots of redundancy in the paths to avoid traffic or
outage...


-paris



-----Original Message-----
From: Neil H. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 08:58
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Clustering


I would like to know what experiences you had with clustering and what you
found to be most cost effective, in terms of price for the solution and TCO.

Thanks,

Neil

----- Original Message -----
From: "Paris Lundis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 8:12 AM
Subject: RE: Clustering


> give me a better idea of what your question is and I will take a stab at
> it... worked on several load balanced systems...
>
> -p
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Neil H. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 08:17
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: OT: Clustering
>
>
> I am curious if anyone has any notes and suggestions from the field
> regarding load balancing and most importantly fail over.  I am not so
> interested in it from a CF perspective but moreso from a hardware / OS
view.
>
> If anyone has any suggestions and comments I would appreciate it.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Neil
>
>
>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to