Jon,

Don't know if you noticed, there's a Quanta Gold just been released!! It's
got an integrated ftp client now, and supposedly better integration with
CVS.  More to the point, on their home page
(www.thekcompany.com/products/quanta) they mention that ColdFusion support
is planned for the syntax highlighting.

This new version is also being charged for though!!   Maybe I'll stick
with jEdit!!

Incidentally, there is also a Windows version of Quanta.

N





On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, jon wrote:

> You know -- there is stuff for Linux that costs money... (just wanted to
> dispell a common myth)
>
> I've been experimenting with Quanta for a development platform -- I think
> it's part of the KDE family of projects. And while you're right, there
> aren't a lot of office drones using Linux as their day to day OS, there
> are a ton of us developing on the platform...
>
>       -- jon
>
>
> ------
> jon roig
> epilepsyfoundation.org
>
> On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Dave Watts wrote:
>
> > > As much as it pains me (most of you know which OS I use) at
> > > this time there are no plans to develop a studio for linux.
> > >
> > > The reasons are legion, and I pester people about it regularly.
> > > That's why I've tried to get you, the developers to show that
> > > there is a demand for a Linux version by helping develop a more
> > > robust system for say, Jedit, or another like-editor.
> > >
> > > I'd love to be able to say that yes, studio for linux is a
> > > "fo'sho" thing, but it's not.
> > >
> > > On the other hand, ColdFusion on Linux rocks! =] /bias
> >
> > As much as it pains me to respond the way I'm doing now, I'm kind of glad
> > there won't be a Linux version of Studio any time soon.
> >
> > Unfortunately, there's no such thing as a free lunch. Porting Studio to
> > Linux would cost MM time and money, which they probably don't have. There's
> > no way in hell they'd be able to recoup their development costs - there
> > simply aren't enough people using Linux as their desktop. I know that you'd
> > be all over it yourself, but I don't think the development costs would be
> > covered by your use - especially since you'd get it for free, working for MM
> > and all. So, MM would have to spread those costs across Studio purchases in
> > general, I think.
> >
> > Second, I suspect that Studio will be changing dramatically in the next
> > release, and if this is true, I'll be happy for a stable Windows version.
> >
> > Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
> > http://www.figleaf.com/
> > voice: (202) 797-5496
> > fax: (202) 797-5444
> >
> 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to