Lot's of ways to get around that... like including the template name in comments on each page.
<!-- Here's an example //--> Mike -----Original Message----- From: Shawn Grover [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 12:02 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Fusebox Question For me, the concept of Fusebox is good, but in practicality it becomes a pain to debug... having to track back through ALL included files to find an error... -----Original Message----- From: Robert Everland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 9:54 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Fusebox Question Fusebox isn't really a changing of anything, all that it does it allow you to have a more thought out way of managing your code. It borrows things from oop where it applies. I use it as much as I can, I would not go back. It allows me to reuse code much easier. Robert Everland III Dixon Ticonderoga Web Developer Extraordinaire -----Original Message----- From: Frank Mamone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 11:48 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Fusebox Question I'm evaluating whether to use Fusebox methodology for our next Intranet. My question is how does fusebox work with CF Advanced Security? We use our NT Security groups for many of our apps. Don't want to lose that. Thanks ______________________________________________________________________ Dedicated Windows 2000 Server PIII 800 / 256 MB RAM / 40 GB HD / 20 GB MO/XFER Instant Activation � $99/Month � Free Setup http://www.pennyhost.com/redirect.cfm?adcode=coldfusiona FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
