Why CF doesn't protect threaded access to shared memory automatically, I'll never know. It just doesn't make any sense. What if you're a hosting provider? Do you have to check all of your clients' code for proper locks? As far as I know, CF is the only app server that has this quirk and I think that locking memoy is something that should be handled behind the scenes.
Maybe this limitation will be alleviated with NEO.... Howie ----- Original Message ----- From: "Raymond Camden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 8:23 AM Subject: RE: UDF question > I don't recommend this. (Notice I said "I", not "Macromedia.") In > general I feel this leads to sloppy programming, and if you migrate and > forget to use this setting, you can get in trouble. > > ======================================================================= > Raymond Camden, Principal Spectra Compliance Engineer for Macromedia > > Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Yahoo IM : morpheus > > "My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: junkMail [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2002 4:30 PM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: Re: UDF question > > > > > > Or enable "Single Threaded Sessions" in the CF Administrator. > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Raymond Camden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2002 3:14 PM > > Subject: RE: UDF question > > > > > > > Of course, you wan't to wrap the call to this UDF in a > > cflock since it > > > reads from the session scope. > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
