> WDDX wasn't really meant for this sort of data. What would > be the advantage of putting it into WDDX? > > CF5 has native support for WDDX?
Yeah, I think that's the big complaint, although I agree with your reasoning and your choice. CF programmers like the convenience of being able to use CFWDDX, rather than having to instantiate an XML parser and find and manipulate the nodes themselves, or use a custom tag which does the same thing. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ voice: (202) 797-5496 fax: (202) 797-5444 ______________________________________________________________________ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
