> Krieg wrote: > > If FuseBox delivered on its promises, all of its interfaces > would be well documented, it would be more than just a model > to code upon, and we'd be in a position where we could pretty > much drop in FuseBox-compliant "applets" (circuits? fuses?) > in and out of our own web applications to our hearts content. > Believe it or not, we finally got there. Fusebox 3 is all neatly packaged in one standard file that everyone uses. It has a well documented API and we can and do drop FB3 "circuits" in and out of apps to our hearts' content. I would encourage anyone who hasn't seen Fusebox 3 to have a look at http://www.fusebox.org. It's not your father's Fusebox.
Patrick ______________________________________________________________________ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
