Sorry, Judith's sick in bed and I just got into work and online. The list membership 
for CF-Talk has been down reciently to 1856 members on list. If you add in the NNTP 
readers, archive readers and all we'd have about double that. This is the reason I 
want to provide better resources. To get the information to more people through more 
channels. 
My goal for the lists are to have them as lists with immediate delivery, digests on 
the hour on up to once a day. An archive that can be searched and posted from that 
will include the proper threading (message id and reference id) when a message is 
posed from them. An NNTP interface so that a post can go from NNTP to the list and the 
archives in one fell swoop. Finally, a web service interface so that other devices can 
get the data. 
This may sound like a lot of work but it's rather easy if done in steps. The staggered 
digests and the archive are done. Plugging a verity search into that is simple to do 
and automating parts of it are one of my specialties (I think I use the scheduler more 
than anyone else around). The posting from the archives to the list is done on the 
back end and just needs a nice front end for it. I wrote a new CF_MakeTree that's 
tighter than hell to get the threading done right. NNTP is something that I'm talking 
to someone about and they can comment on it if they want. Web services is just a quick 
CFC to the archives with no real front end. 
Step by step it's being done and will get done. 

At 11:21 AM 5/15/02, you wrote:
>Still didn't hear...
>
>Michael,
>
>How many of us on this list?  And do you have any stats on how many are
>"active"?
>
>
>
______________________________________________________________________
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to