>It doesn't make any sense to say "JDBC is faster than ODBC". There are fast >and slow JDBC clients, and fast and slow ODBC clients. I doubt that using >the best Type 4 JDBC client against MS SQL Server will be as fast as using >the standard ODBC client for it.
Agreed, I have seen stuff around the programs stating "its fast/faster", but I have also heard "its slow/slower" etc... :) >Also, if by "the bridge" you mean the JDBC-ODBC bridge from Sun, if you se >that you will certainly suffer performance issues. It's a Type 1 driver if >Irecall correctly, and designed more for demonstration purposes than >anything else from my understanding. As for this, I am pretty sure it�s a bridge. CFMX installs with the IBM JRE (well it did in earlier releases). >I wouldn't be surprised if CF MX does turn out to be slower than CF 5 - hmm, I think its all relative - I too would be happy for more features....now wheres that bandwagon.... - N ______________________________________________________________________ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
