Why is cfmodule faster? I assume it might be a bit faster on the first call to a tag since the cf_ method requires that CF search the tree of installed tags to find the correct template to run, whereas with cf module you can specify the exact location. However, I've noticed that CF seems to cache the location of recently used custom tags, probably to address this very issue. So presumably, subsequent calls using cf_ or cfmodule would perform the same. Of course I have no idea on how long this cache persists or what it's maximum size might be, so in general it's probably safe to say cfmodule is slightly faster.
Are there any internal implemenation details which make cfmodule faster than the cf_ syntax, or was this what you were refering to? Just curious... </rob> -----Original Message----- From: Philip Arnold - ASP [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 12:54 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Quick question on custom tags Nah, it works happily - in fact, <CFMODULE is faster than <CF_ so it should work better for you Philip Arnold Technical Director Certified ColdFusion Developer ASP Multimedia Limited Switchboard: +44 (0)20 8680 8099 Fax: +44 (0)20 8686 7911 www.aspmedia.co.uk www.aspevents.net An ISO9001 registered company. ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ********************************************************************** ______________________________________________________________________ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
