>Yes, I've used them successfully instead of CFHTTP. I've been very happy >with them as a component vendor, with other components, in the past, as >well. On the other hand, I wouldn't use COM with CF MX; I've been playing
No kidding. The COM object TCPClient doesn't work under CF6 because of CFMX's inability to properly understand property attributes among other things. Same with all other COM's I've tried. At the moment about the only things that do sort of work under it are those things which are Java based. --min >with the Jakarta io JSP tag library as a CFHTTP replacement for CF MX. I >haven't tried it with HTTPS yet, though. ______________________________________________________________________ Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
