I can't imagine a world without your TCPclient COM object. I'm not joking.
(maybe its just the sort of apps I commonly do) > -----Original Message----- > From: Lewis Sellers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 18 June 2002 16:58 > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: SSL COM Objects (WAS: Need help with CFMX/ASP.NET > comparison. ..) > > > >Yes, I've used them successfully instead of CFHTTP. I've > been very happy > >with them as a component vendor, with other components, in > the past, as > >well. On the other hand, I wouldn't use COM with CF MX; I've > been playing > > No kidding. The COM object TCPClient doesn't work under CF6 because of > CFMX's inability to properly understand property attributes among > other things. Same with all other COM's I've tried. > > At the moment about the only things that do sort of work under it are > those things which are Java based. > > --min > > >with the Jakarta io JSP tag library as a CFHTTP replacement > for CF MX. I > >haven't tried it with HTTPS yet, though. > > ______________________________________________________________________ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
