Dave Watts wrote: > > Simply because I can do it other places, or that it's done for me already in > other places. I think that it's inefficient to do on the host, compared to > doing it at the network's point of entry. It doesn't really matter how > significant the performance hit is, if it is unnecessary. For that matter, I > prefer having SSL handled by something other than the physical web server, > simply because there are devices that do it better - and can do it for > multiple hosts. > > However, I realize that my criteria in this case aren't necessarily optimal > for everyone's use.
Join the shared hosting club :( With a /23 as the production LAN, I would like to limit customers on one hosted server from accessing certain other servers on the same subnet. > However, I don't see why you expect the OS vendor to > provide everything for you! I don't expect them to, but that doesn't mean I can't ask. Jochem ______________________________________________________________________ Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
