I know they all have their pros and cons. I think the pros for MX outweigh and performance things that i've been using.
Bill Wheatley Senior Database Developer Macromedia Certified Advanced Coldfusion Developer EDIETS.COM 954.360.9022 X159 ICQ 417645 ----- Original Message ----- From: "S. Isaac Dealey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 11:43 AM Subject: Re: Storing Queries in Application Scope > > Yup now we're at cfmx which cf5 still is faster then > > though mx does alot of neat things 5 doesn't. Maybe > > someday someone can make J2EE run a little faster lol. > > I've heard 2 things about the speed of MX ... > > 1) that it's inherently much faster than CF5 > > 2) that code optimized for CF5 > is _much_ slower on MX than on CF5 > > Not sure how much truth is in those statements in general... Based on some > of the stuff I've seen on MX, I'd be inclined to agree that it's inherently > faster... I ran the CFMX code validator on an application of mine with > several _thousand_ files and it returned results in less than a second > iirc... I wouldn't expect that kind of processing speed from anything that > parses templates for code validation in CF5... Could be that it uses a C++ > com object to accomplish the task tho... I wouldn't know... > > Isaac Dealey > www.turnkey.to > 954-776-0046 > ______________________________________________________________________ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
