Well on the surface, waiting for a SP seems like a good idea. Then again, if you don't try and upgrade; MM won't be aware of your problems, so they won't get fixed in the SP.
Matt Liotta President & CEO Montara Software, Inc. http://www.montarasoftware.com/ V: 415-577-8070 F: 415-341-8906 P: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -----Original Message----- > From: Douglas Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 10:54 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: Storing Queries in Application Scope > > This really is a problem with upgrading to MX. I would hate to re-write > and > entire application just because MX does not seem to play well with CF5 > code. I > have seen so many posts regarding problems people are having with MX and > am > wondering if I should just wait until a SP comes out for it. What are > everone > elses thoughts? > > > > > Douglas Brown > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Matt Liotta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 10:44 AM > Subject: RE: Storing Queries in Application Scope > > > > It really depends on how your application is put together. If you > > followed some of the standard ways CF applications were put together, > > then CFMX will smoke CF 5. However, if you had taken the time to write > > applications that were designed to smoke every other application server > > on the market with CF 5, you are pretty much screwed with CFMX. > > > > Matt Liotta > > President & CEO > > Montara Software, Inc. > > http://www.montarasoftware.com/ > > V: 415-577-8070 > > F: 415-341-8906 > > P: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Stacy Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 10:42 AM > > > To: CF-Talk > > > Subject: RE: Storing Queries in Application Scope > > > > > > Really? Our CFMX smokes any of our CF5 installs! You sure you don't > > have > > > debug on? ;-) > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 11:27 AM > > > To: CF-Talk > > > Subject: Re: Storing Queries in Application Scope > > > > > > Yup now we're at cfmx which cf5 still is faster then though mx does > > alot > > > of > > > neat things 5 doesn't. Maybe someday someone can make J2EE run a > > little > > > faster lol. > > > > > > Bill Wheatley > > > Senior Database Developer > > > Macromedia Certified Advanced Coldfusion Developer > > > EDIETS.COM > > > 954.360.9022 X159 > > > ICQ 417645 > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 11:21 AM > > > Subject: Re: Storing Queries in Application Scope > > > > > > > > > > *sniff sniff* ahh, the good old CF3 days, back when there were a > > > > zillion restrictions on cfoutput.... Pound signs everywhere.... > > > > cfloops that counted slower than you saying the numbers.... > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: Zac Spitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Date: Friday, July 12, 2002 9:14 am > > > > Subject: Re: Storing Queries in Application Scope > > > > > > > > > Dave Watts wrote: > > > > > >>Why can I not just reference my queries at > > > > > >>application.[queryName].[value] throughout my > > > > > >>application? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You can. This is actually described near the bottom of the > > > > > technote.I'm not > > > > > > sure why the writer bothered with all that copying queries to > > > > > arrays > > > > > stuff > > > > > > at the top. > > > > > > > > > > and the coding style is bad way to many #'s where they aren't need > > and > > > > > they don't lock! but it's cf 3.0 code :-) > > > > > > > > > > z > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
