Joe
Are you saying if i' copy a session var to the request scope
simply using <cfset request.var = session.var > , because their both complex
datatypes
i'm still only creating a pointer and actually need to use the duplicate
function?


Thanks

Kola

> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: 13 July 2002 23:56
> >To: CF-Talk
> >Subject: RE: RE: RE: Storing Queries in Application Scope
> >
> >
> >Hi Joe,
> >
> >The reason for using the duplicate() function to copy data
> >between the request and application scopes is that creating a
> >pointer to an application scope query in the request scope, i.e.
> >
> ><cflock scope="application" ...>
> ><cset request.myquery = application.myquery>
> ></cflock>
> >
> >defeats the purpose of locking the application scope, since
> >using the pointer created in this example is still using the
> >application scope directly and thus creates the potential for
> >server instability as a result of application scope race conditions.
> >
> >You can test this in CF 5 : in the CF Administrator turn on
> >"require locking" for the application scope, then use the above
> >example and reference the query outside the lock -- CF Server
> >responds with an error message indicating that the query
> >contains variables in the application scope and therefore cannot
> >be referenced without an active lock.
> >
> >In some cases it's better to simply reference individual
> >variables in a cflock since you can't manipulate the pointer to
> >a simple value directly in ColdFusion. If you need the entire
> >contents of a query however, it's often more efficient to go
> >ahead and use the extra memory in the request scope and let the
> >CF Server's "garbage collection" handle freeing that memory up
> >after it finishes parsing the page.
> >
> >Admittedly, I tend to err on the side of using more memory
> >rather than going to the db more often, etc... The reason I do
> >this is because memory is generally less expensive and easier to
> >install than more processor speed, etc. Especially lately --
> >anyone else notice the fire-sales on RAM this year? :)
> >
> >Isaac
> >
> >www.turnkey.to
> >954-776-0046
> >
> >Original Message -----------------------
> >Hi Issac,
> >     Your are right as well.."Right tool for the right Job". I
> >wonder if it
> >would be a
> >     better solution to "NOT Duplicate the Structure" like
> >     <cflock type="readonly" timeout="20">
> >     <cfset Request.MyReqQuery=Application.MyQuery>  Note: No
> >Duplicate or
> >StructCopy
> >     </cflock>
> >     There by only making referrence to Application scope like a
> >POINTER since
> >     the data doesnt need to manipulated and only stored/displayed.
> >     Wouldnt this save memory space.. since u are not really
> >creating a DEEP
> >Copy
> >     into the 2nd structure(Request)?
> >Joe
> >Certified Advanced ColdFusion Developer
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
______________________________________________________________________
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to