[cfaussie] Re: Whats so bad about the tag syntax?

Wed, 10 May 2006 18:56:19 -0700

Mark,
 
Well pre CFMX the cfscript did used to run faster, but now that it is Java based for Coldfusion this argument is now debatable.


 
On 5/11/06, Mark Stanton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Woot! converting tag based syntax into cfscript makes the code run
faster? I've never heard that one before...

On 5/11/06, Joel Cass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> For some things it seems a lot faster, especially when there's a lot of
> processing involved of structs and arrays etc. But not everything I guess..
> Usually the code starts off in tags and if I see that it's running a bit
> slow I change it to cfscript.. Sometimes it runs a bit faster.. I cannot
> give you hard examples though. Maybe it's because I turn the tags into
> functions in the process.. who knows. I am a bit old school. I still take
> pleasure in the joys of using cold fusion studio 4.5 every now and then.
>
>
> Joel
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf
> Of M@ Bourke
> Sent: Wednesday, 10 May 2006 7:46 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [cfaussie] Re: Whats so bad about the tag syntax?
>
> >I only use cfscript to improve the speed of things
>
> How so?
> you mean writing it??
> as cfml hasn't been any slower then cfscript since mx came out.
> back in the olden days cfscript was faster but these days its all compiled
> to the same old byte code
>
> M@
>
>
>  >
>
>


--
Mark Stanton
Gruden Pty Ltd
http://www.gruden.com


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to