And this is why I'll probably never use it... http://techrepublic.com.com/5254-6257-0.html?forumID=99&threadID=176853&messageID=2024208&id=2252949
B) Barry Beattie wrote: > have ppl seen what Microsoft are up to? > > http://australianit.news.com.au/articles/0,7204,19345228%5E15865%5E%5Enbv%5E,00.html > > > > On 6/8/06, Joel Cass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Just wondering (this may sound a little dumb to some of you), how can I find >> out more information about Symantec's "architecturally poor" software >> architecture? How do you gauge it against other antivirus apps in this way? >> It's always been very reliable and has picked up viruses pretty well up til >> now.. >> >> Joel >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Behalf Of Kym Kovan >> Sent: Thursday, 8 June 2006 10:19 AM >> To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com >> Subject: [cfaussie] Re: OT: Virus protection software >> >> >> >> Hi Ryan, >> >> you wrote: >>> Just a quick poll to find out which Virus / Spyware protection >>> software people are using these days (no Linux is not an answer :). I >>> turn to you CFAUSSIES because you probably have a similar work >>> environment to me, and so understand the needs of a web agency. >>> >>> We have been using CA VET until now, but that product is being phased >>> out. I have had Symantec AV Corporate Edition recommended to me, but >>> our experience in the past with Symantec products is that they can be >>> intrusive for a developer. >> Also Symantec's stuff is poor architecturally, it is not as effective as >> some of the other products out there. >> >>> I gave McAfee Managed VirusScan a go, but it seemed to have a conflict >>> with our desktop contact manager, which slowed to a crawl. >> The only useful thing we found with McAffee was being able to scan >> machines across the network when they were idle as the load was >> intrusive otherwise. >> >>> Any ideas? >> yes, TrendMicro. >> >> Excellent range of products from personal PC protection to >> Enterprise-wide networked servers... >> >> Mind you we are biased as we are TrendMicro consulting partners but that >> is for a reason, we checked all of the major firms and they were closest >> to what we felt were our needs as a development shop and a Hosting Provider. >> >> >> HTH, >> >> Kym K >> - where did my signature line go? - >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
