Doh, That was what I was afraid of thanks Mark. Senior Coldfusion Developer Aegeon Pty. Ltd. www.aegeon.com.au Phone: +613 8676 4223 Mobile: 0404 998 273
-----Original Message----- From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Mandel Sent: Wednesday, 9 August 2006 11:11 AM To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com Subject: [cfaussie] Re: Quick question Exactly. I ran a quick test: This is the CFC I created: <cffunction name="init" hint="Constructor" access="remote" returntype="obj" output="false"> <cfscript> setThing("fred"); return this; </cfscript> </cffunction> <cffunction name="getthing" access="private" returntype="string" output="false"> <cfreturn variables.thing /> </cffunction> <cffunction name="setthing" access="private" returntype="void" output="false"> <cfargument name="thing" type="string" required="true"> <cfset variables.thing = arguments.thing /> </cffunction> </cfcomponent> This is the wddx it returns when you access it via the URL: <wddxPacket version='1.0'><header/><data><struct type='coldfusion.runtime.TemplateProxy'><var name='INIT'><struct type='Lcfobj2ecfc496430799$funcINIT;'><var name='access'><string>remote</string></var><var name='metadata'><struct type='coldfusion.runtime.AttributeCollection'><var name='HINT'><string>Constructor</string></var><var name='RETURNTYPE'><string>obj</string></var><var name='ACCESS'><string>remote</string></var><var name='OUTPUT'><string>false</string></var><var name='PARAMETERS'><array length='0'></array></var><var name='NAME'><string>init</string></var></struct></var><var name='output'><string>false</string></var><var name='pagePath'><string>C:\Inetpub\wwwroot\test\returns\obj.cfc</string></va r><var name='returnType'><string>obj</string></var><var name='superScope'><struct type='coldfusion.runtime.VariableScope'><var name='SUPER'><struct type='coldfusion.runtime.SuperScope'></struct></var></struct></var></struct> </var></struct></data></wddxPacket> See? Mark On 8/9/06, Andrew Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That's what I was afraid of, so if this.teststring = 'test'; would not be > returned in the object is what your saying? > > Senior Coldfusion Developer > Aegeon Pty. Ltd. > www.aegeon.com.au > Phone: +613 8676 4223 > Mobile: 0404 998 273 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Mark Mandel > Sent: Wednesday, 9 August 2006 11:02 AM > To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com > Subject: [cfaussie] Re: Quick question > > > Andrew, > > CFC's are not serialisable, so all you get back is a WDDX packet that > describes the CFC, not its current state. > > Mark > > On 8/9/06, Andrew Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Mark, > > > > Thanks but the code I use also allows for wddx, so if it was to return > this, > > it would be serialised as a wddx packet and reserialised at the other end > > anyway. jsmx is great in this way. > > > > I am also aware of the differences in cfc's as not being normal java > > objects, but I did rewrite my own java version of cfquery once before > which > > worked well as an object of type Map, which is why I was thinking out > aloud > > here. > > > -- > E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > W: www.compoundtheory.com > > > > > > -- E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: www.compoundtheory.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
