>grumble<
Just for you two lazy boys ;o)
Code:
<cffunction name="init" hint="Constructor" access="remote"
returntype="obj" output="false">
<cfscript>
setThing("fred");
return this;
</cfscript>
</cffunction>
<cffunction name="getthing" access="private" returntype="string" output="false">
<cfreturn this.thing />
</cffunction>
<cffunction name="setthing" access="private" returntype="void" output="false">
<cfargument name="thing" type="string" required="true">
<cfset this.thing = arguments.thing />
</cffunction>
</cfcomponent>
Result:
<wddxPacket version='1.0'><header/><data><struct
type='coldfusion.runtime.TemplateProxy'><var name='INIT'><struct
type='Lcfobj2ecfc496430799$funcINIT;'><var
name='access'><string>remote</string></var><var
name='metadata'><struct
type='coldfusion.runtime.AttributeCollection'><var
name='HINT'><string>Constructor</string></var><var
name='RETURNTYPE'><string>obj</string></var><var
name='ACCESS'><string>remote</string></var><var
name='OUTPUT'><string>false</string></var><var
name='PARAMETERS'><array length='0'></array></var><var
name='NAME'><string>init</string></var></struct></var><var
name='output'><string>false</string></var><var
name='pagePath'><string>C:\Inetpub\wwwroot\test\returns\obj.cfc</string></var><var
name='returnType'><string>obj</string></var><var
name='superScope'><struct type='coldfusion.runtime.VariableScope'><var
name='SUPER'><struct
type='coldfusion.runtime.SuperScope'></struct></var></struct></var></struct></var><var
name='THING'><string>fred</string></var></struct></data></wddxPacket>
See, still doesn't work.
Ner ner.
;oD
Mark
On 8/9/06, Andrew Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Actually Mark,
>
> I did say to return this object to loop over the properties:-) And we all
> know that means public variables:-)
>
>
>
> Senior Coldfusion Developer
> Aegeon Pty. Ltd.
> www.aegeon.com.au
> Phone: +613 8676 4223
> Mobile: 0404 998 273
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Mark Mandel
> Sent: Wednesday, 9 August 2006 11:55 AM
> To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
> Subject: [cfaussie] Re: Quick question
>
>
> No,
>
> He requested that 'this' be returned, i.e. the object itself.
>
> He said nothing about public or private methods.
>
> He wanted to be able to port the Object, public, or private state all
> across.
>
> Mark
>
> On 8/9/06, Dale Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Mark,
> >
> > Your example showed nothing. There is nothing public to see if the object
> > would be accessible externally. If you don't want a public variable, then
> at
> > least make your getter public so that we could establish if the object
> could
> > be accessed.
> >
> > Andrew requested a this. Scope variable (public) so that he could see if
> > that variable would be visible in the object.
> >
> > Regards
> > Dale Fraser
> >
> > http://dale.fraser.id.au
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf
> > Of Mark Mandel
> > Sent: Wednesday, 9 August 2006 11:33 AM
> > To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
> > Subject: [cfaussie] Re: Quick question
> >
> >
> > Why would you be using public variables, Dale?
> >
> > Mark
> >
> > On 8/9/06, Dale Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Mark,
> > >
> > > But you didn't include any public variables, only private ones.
> > >
> > > Can you do it again with a this variable?
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Dale Fraser
> > >
> > > http://dale.fraser.id.au
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> > Behalf
> > > Of Mark Mandel
> > > Sent: Wednesday, 9 August 2006 11:11 AM
> > > To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
> > > Subject: [cfaussie] Re: Quick question
> > >
> > >
> > > Exactly.
> > >
> > > I ran a quick test:
> > >
> > > This is the CFC I created:
> > > <cffunction name="init" hint="Constructor" access="remote"
> > > returntype="obj" output="false">
> > > <cfscript>
> > > setThing("fred");
> > >
> > > return this;
> > > </cfscript>
> > > </cffunction>
> > >
> > > <cffunction name="getthing" access="private" returntype="string"
> > > output="false">
> > > <cfreturn variables.thing />
> > > </cffunction>
> > >
> > > <cffunction name="setthing" access="private" returntype="void"
> > > output="false">
> > > <cfargument name="thing" type="string" required="true">
> > > <cfset variables.thing = arguments.thing />
> > > </cffunction>
> > > </cfcomponent>
> > >
> > > This is the wddx it returns when you access it via the URL:
> > > <wddxPacket version='1.0'><header/><data><struct
> > > type='coldfusion.runtime.TemplateProxy'><var name='INIT'><struct
> > > type='Lcfobj2ecfc496430799$funcINIT;'><var
> > > name='access'><string>remote</string></var><var
> > > name='metadata'><struct
> > > type='coldfusion.runtime.AttributeCollection'><var
> > > name='HINT'><string>Constructor</string></var><var
> > > name='RETURNTYPE'><string>obj</string></var><var
> > > name='ACCESS'><string>remote</string></var><var
> > > name='OUTPUT'><string>false</string></var><var
> > > name='PARAMETERS'><array length='0'></array></var><var
> > > name='NAME'><string>init</string></var></struct></var><var
> > > name='output'><string>false</string></var><var
> > >
> >
> name='pagePath'><string>C:\Inetpub\wwwroot\test\returns\obj.cfc</string></va
> > > r><var
> > > name='returnType'><string>obj</string></var><var
> > > name='superScope'><struct type='coldfusion.runtime.VariableScope'><var
> > > name='SUPER'><struct
> > >
> >
> type='coldfusion.runtime.SuperScope'></struct></var></struct></var></struct>
> > > </var></struct></data></wddxPacket>
> > >
> > > See?
> > >
> > > Mark
> > >
> > > On 8/9/06, Andrew Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > That's what I was afraid of, so if this.teststring = 'test'; would not
> > be
> > > > returned in the object is what your saying?
> > > >
> > > > Senior Coldfusion Developer
> > > > Aegeon Pty. Ltd.
> > > > www.aegeon.com.au
> > > > Phone: +613 8676 4223
> > > > Mobile: 0404 998 273
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> > > Behalf
> > > > Of Mark Mandel
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, 9 August 2006 11:02 AM
> > > > To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
> > > > Subject: [cfaussie] Re: Quick question
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Andrew,
> > > >
> > > > CFC's are not serialisable, so all you get back is a WDDX packet that
> > > > describes the CFC, not its current state.
> > > >
> > > > Mark
> > > >
> > > > On 8/9/06, Andrew Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Mark,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks but the code I use also allows for wddx, so if it was to
> return
> > > > this,
> > > > > it would be serialised as a wddx packet and reserialised at the
> other
> > > end
> > > > > anyway. jsmx is great in this way.
> > > > >
> > > > > I am also aware of the differences in cfc's as not being normal java
> > > > > objects, but I did rewrite my own java version of cfquery once
> before
> > > > which
> > > > > worked well as an object of type Map, which is why I was thinking
> out
> > > > aloud
> > > > > here.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > W: www.compoundtheory.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > W: www.compoundtheory.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > W: www.compoundtheory.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> W: www.compoundtheory.com
>
>
>
> >
>
--
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
W: www.compoundtheory.com
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
