so, Scott, are you going?

and (to all) who else, come hell or high water?




On 10/12/06, Scott Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FAAAAAAAAAAARK you guys complain more and more these days.
>
> 1) Daemon run the conference for a specific reason as same as they do in
> terms of fullasagoog.com simply because they promote thought around the
> various elements required in order to develop on some of the
> Macromedia/Adobe product range.
>
> 2) Logistics for this setup are quite large, and anyone who's planned a
> conference will tell you that even finding a venue is somewhat hard and not
> to mention other components that play a role. I've seen these guys in action
> first hand and while on the surface it looks easy, its not realy and it
> takes a lot out of them - keeping in mind they run quite a successful yet
> busy business at the same time. So let's not forget this is a labour of love
> and despite the ticket price, the profit margins for this wouldn't be as
> high as most think, and knowing Geoff and co most if not all profits would
> end up back into the budget for next year and so on.
>
> 3) I prefer Daemon to run it instead of Adobe, as we will end up with a
> commercially driven conference instead of a raw-nerd fest. Its keeping the
> "bastards honest" so to speak but ensures that there is a nice balance to
> the content in question. It also provides an outlet for the average
> coldfusion/flex/flash punter to expand his/her mind into other areas such as
> "Microsoft" or "Other". So its not all about brand shovelling.
>
> 4) Overall, I'm sure we could gather up some sponsorship here in Queensland
> to provide a basic foundation for this event but overall why? I could
> probably twist a few arms such as TQ and QR to sponsor it of some nature it
> it were up here but in reality and i don't see the payoff.
>
> This is an event in which it promotes thought about the tools we use, its
> not about selling them and so its a hard upsell to the current sponsors as
> is.  Thats my thoughts anyway
>
> Besides Sydney is more of a central location all things considered.
>
>
>
> On 10/11/06, Barry Beattie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > PS: I have never been because it's in Sydney, but I am going to Max. If
> I
> > > have to travel to a conference I want to get the most from my money.
> >
> > PS: I have never been to Max because it isn't cheap or easy to get to.
> > If I have to travel oversees to a conference then I'd like it to not
> > cost the earth** nor take a week out of my life and family - I want to
> > get the most from my mortgage.
> >
> >
> > different strokes, etc. Perhaps do a breezo Austrailia wide when you
> > get back, see what the attendance to it is like?
> >
> >
> > b
> >
> > ** Actually I'd rather not go to a conference then but visit relatives
> > in Finland or haggis shooting in Scotland. Perhaps the Czech Republic
> > even. Anywhere but the USA, really. Going all that way just to hear
> > someone prattle on about technology? yawn... Sydney's closer....
> >
> > http://www.mossyblog.com
> > > >
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to