Hi Ryan, SOE is supposedly the ducks nuts as to why. Yet, you'd have to be a moron to expect Google to differentiate between XHTML vs HTML as in the end, content is the one commodity google and co want initially.
I've read many a debate on it, but in the end the browsers are smart enough and will continue to evolve to the fact that tag prediction and differentiating between Style vs Semantically Correct tagging has probably become a moot point these days and usually reserved for the HTML purists out there. If Google make a press announcement tomorrow that says "We will give extra points to those of you who markeup using Strict XHTML from this day forward" and maybe you can argue the case of "return on investment" in terms of spending the extra time and effort to ensure its all valid and disco. I'd only realistically argue the value of XHTML Strict in today's space is simply because it will ensure that if you move your technology suite into the next generation agent(s) then at least you may be able to resurrect content as XML? On 12/6/06, Ryan Sabir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hey all, > > How many of you are developing sites in XHTML these days? Is it worth the > extra effort? > > thanks. > > > Ryan Sabir > Technical Director > > *p:* (02) 9274 8030 > *f:* (02) 9274 8099 > *m:* 0411 512 454 > *w:* www.newgency.com *Newgency Pty Ltd* > Web | Multimedia | eMarketing > > 224 Riley St > Surry Hills NSW 2010 > Sydney, Australia > > > > > > -- Regards, Scott Barnes http://www.mossyblog.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
