I agree. But this is exactly why we *deprecate*: It's formal acknowledgement that there's a better way of doing something, an official statement saying the old functionality shouldn't be used.
Raymond Camden wrote: > On Jan 8, 2008 4:50 PM, Andrew Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I agree with what you have stated, but it would have been better to enhance >> one function than create a separate one, just my opinion that's all and they >> have alpha and beta testers that can check for breakage. >> >> > > Heh, they can have 1000 alpha testers, and that's still a drop in the > bucket to the _millions_ of lines of code out there. Trust me - the > backwards compat thing bugs me too, but I can definitely understand > Adobe's position here. > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
