I think it's 250,000 documents, or something like that. The number might be wrong but it's the number of documents that is the limit. Also 1 document = 1 database row if you're indexing a database, etc.
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 10:51 AM, Steve Onnis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Which brings me to my next question... > > What are the limitations on verity? > > - x number of documents in a collection? > - does it index the whole document or the first x bytes or pages? > > an so on > > ------------------------------ > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On > Behalf Of *MrBuzzy > *Sent:* Saturday, 31 May 2008 11:36 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [cfaussie] Re: verity quirks > > > The project may have been abandoned, but a few different people have worked > on Lucence and CF (Dimitri, ray, me, guy from whirlpool i forget his name > (sorry)). There must be more folk. Maybe a discussion for OpenBD... > > Are we allowed to go OT yet? I think Steve solved his problem, or at least > evolved it :) > > The verity in CF is capped at (x) documents and is/was expensive to expand. > I also recall having an index on one CF server was not so esy to use on > another CF server. I recall having to expose verify functionality as a web > service so other servers could invoke the same search. Meaning the server > with the index was a single point of failure. What do you disagree with Ray? > I did say 'maybe'... of course a jedi could make it work any which way he > liked :) > > On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 12:59 AM, Raymond Camden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> >> When was the last time it was worked on? I think last time I checked >> it was abandoned. The URL seems dea for sure. >> >> I also respectfully disagree with you about Verity. But that's another >> topic. >> >> On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 10:14 AM, MrBuzzy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Wouldn't it make sense to collaborate more on (cf)Lucene? I know of a >> few >> > people who have worked on it. I don't quite get why so multiple variants >> of >> > the same thing need to exists. I'm not saying there's anything wrong >> with >> > that... but it could all be *better*. Maybe if it was good enough Adobe >> > could drop Verity...? >> > >> > My 2c - ditch Verity. From experience it only works practically with one >> CF >> > instance. Try to scale up/out and you're going to have some issues, >> maybe :P >> > >> >> >> > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
