Totally agree mate.
From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Barnes Sent: Thursday, 3 July 2008 2:51 PM To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com Subject: [cfaussie] Re: Per application mapping Application.CFC is the only way to fly as you set yourself up for better OO composition. On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Rony Fayyad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Well one of my colleagues was saying that using application.cfc broke some of the application. Can't recall what it was but that is why we have not moved into the application.cfc yet. Thanks for your feedback Mark. Much appreciated. From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Mandel Sent: Thursday, 3 July 2008 2:18 PM To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com Subject: [cfaussie] Re: Per application mapping Yup, you can only do it application.cfc Why don't you convert the application.cfm to a .cfc, it's usually pretty straight forward. Mark On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Rony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi All, I have utilised the CF8 per application mapping in a couple of my projects that all use application.cfc. Now, I am working on a project that uses application.cfm. Doing what i did in the application.cfc for other projects DID NOT work for the application.cfm Does the per application setting ONLY work for application.cfc and NOT application.cfm? Thanks. -- E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: www.compoundtheory.com <http://www.compoundtheory.com/> <br --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
