Rony, just to back up Ray's comment of "If something breaks, its your code's fault"
think of it as a ticking time-bomb just waiting to go off. - one job: an upgrade from CF6.1 to CF7 broke the use of request headers for an ISAPI filter-based authentication. The ISAPI filter was broken and CF6 hid it. - another: upgrade from CF6.1 to CF7 showed the incorrect use of cfbreak within cfswitch and some arrays that were assumed (by an experienced C programmer new to CF) to be passed by reference (but obviously by value). of course, if the app has a shelf life of only the rest of the year, then it's not worth it, but if something breaks on a straightforward change like App.cfm to App.cfc, there's a bigger story there that may pay dividends in getting to the bottom of. An accident waiting to happen, perhaps? just bringing up some points as ammunition if you're talking to the boss, nothing more. On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 7:42 AM, Rony Fayyad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ray, thanks for that. > > I have not investigated the reason why the application failed , but it is > beyond my control and my decision as to whether we move to application.cfc > or not. > > I do find that application.cfc is much easier and cleaner and I love it. I > use it for all my other projects but with this existing application, I > simply cannot ( at the present time anyways ). > > -----Original Message----- > From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Raymond Camden > Sent: Friday, 4 July 2008 1:21 AM > To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com > Subject: [cfaussie] Re: Per application mapping > > > I'm not sure this comment really makes sense. Having a OO designed > model isnt' really something that forces you to use Application.cfc. > The main thing App.cfc gives you is more fine grained control over > application events and settings. > > That being said - Rony, definitely switch. If something breaks, its > your code's fault. I'd be willing to bet you guys used onRequest and > that broke your web service/flash remoting calls. The fix for that is > to just remove it. ;) > > On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 11:51 PM, Scott Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> Application.CFC is the only way to fly as you set yourself up for better > OO >> composition. >> >> On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Rony Fayyad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> Well one of my colleagues was saying that using application.cfc broke > some >>> of the application. Can't recall what it was but that is why we have not >>> moved into the application.cfc yet. >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks for your feedback Mark. Much appreciated. >>> >>> >>> >>> From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >>> Behalf Of Mark Mandel >>> Sent: Thursday, 3 July 2008 2:18 PM >>> To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com >>> Subject: [cfaussie] Re: Per application mapping >>> >>> >>> >>> Yup, you can only do it application.cfc >>> >>> Why don't you convert the application.cfm to a .cfc, it's usually pretty >>> straight forward. >>> >>> Mark >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Rony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> I have utilised the CF8 per application mapping in a couple of my >>> projects that all use application.cfc. >>> >>> Now, I am working on a project that uses application.cfm. Doing what i >>> did in the application.cfc for other projects DID NOT work for the >>> application.cfm >>> >>> Does the per application setting ONLY work for application.cfc and NOT >>> application.cfm? >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> W: www.compoundtheory.com >>> >>> >> >> > > > > -- > =========================================================================== > Raymond Camden, VP of Software Dev, Broadchoice > > Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Blog : www.coldfusionjedi.com > AOL IM : cfjedimaster > > Keep up to date with the community: http://www.coldfusionbloggers.org > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
