Sounds like you have a good standard to use then.  If you pick a font
that requires a check digit, and dont provide a check digit,  then the
scanner's firmware will flag that read as invalid.   That's what the
check digit's for - to stop invalid reads getting into the system at
source.  it's the check digit concept that's allowed things like
barcode reading in automated baggage handling equipment at the airport
to identify bags whizzing past on a conveyer, and the rapid reading at
the supermarket.

Anyway, if you arent using a font that requires a check digit,  you're
ok at least so far.  You'll just need to make sure your procedures
require whoever scans the barcode checks that the number it's
collected is a valid number in the database.   You'll need a big popup
in the screen saying "INVALID NUMBER TRY AGAIN" or something to handle
the possibility that the scanner reads the  barcode wrong.

3of9 is one of the earliest barcodes and the simplest.  There isnt any
algorithm behind the numbering - there's just a set of thick and thin
bars representing each of the ten numbers and that's about it.   As
time went on and applications got more complex and automated,  more
and more checking came into barcoding, but a simple 3of9 sounds about
all you need, I think.

Cheers
Mike Kear
Windsor, NSW, Australia
Adobe Certified Advanced ColdFusion Developer
AFP Webworks
http://afpwebworks.com
ColdFusion, PHP, ASP, ASP.NET hosting from AUD$15/month



On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 9:29 PM, Taco Fleur <[email protected]> wrote:
>  That's a good question. I guess I don't really care, just setting up a
> membership system for our gym that's opening soon. I used 39 I think it is,
> printed it and scanned it, it worked. I feel a bit lost not knowing the ins
> and outs but it works...
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en.

Reply via email to