People just don't get my humour We actually use Hibernate and Cold Spring
I personally like fw1, think Coldbox is feature rich but a bit overwhelming Haven't played with Wheels, but it seems to be getting a lot of mentions of late, must be something to that. But people expect me to bag frameworks, so I aim to please. Regards Dale Fraser http://dale.fraser.id.au http://cfmldocs.com http://learncf.com http://flexcf.com -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bill Sent: Sunday, 19 February 2012 1:00 AM To: cfaussie Subject: [cfaussie] Re: Recommendations for a CF Framework. Not understanding the hate for frameworks @DaleFraser. I have great experiences using both Coldbox and CFWheels in production environments. ColdBox in particular is well-suited to enterprise scale production websites. IMO the purpose of a framework is to ease development (individually and across teams), incorporate proven methodologies and provide an extensible architecture. Why re-invent the wheel each and every time you need to spin up a website/app? In my case, I use Coldbox as our front-end, high availability application framework and CFWheels on the administrative back end. Both are fantastic, robust, have a great community and really bring ColdFusion into line with the times. I've also worked with Mach-II and it gets the big smackdown from Coldbox and CFWheels. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en.
