thanks zac

On Wednesday, August 19, 2015 at 2:48:40 PM UTC+10, Zac Spitzer wrote:
>
> I agree with Andrew,
>
> also, keep in mind migrating from one MVC framework like Mach-II to 
> another MVC is reasonably easy 
> compared to adopting a framework from a more free style code base
>
> whatever you do, get off CF 6.1 as it's very old and quirky (think IE6 
> compared to modern CF engines)
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Andrew Scott <and...@andyscott.id.au 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> Mach II hasn't seen any development for over 8 years or even more. If you 
>> are going to go with a framework, then you would be better to go with 
>> something that can scale your site or roll your own.
>>
>> Personally, Coldbox is the far better framework. Mach II, is slow and out 
>> dated and bloated for what it delivers.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Andrew Scott
>> WebSite: http://www.andyscott.id.au/
>> Google+:  http://plus.google.com/113032480415921517411
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Omer Yafai <omer...@gmail.com 
>> <javascript:>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Charlie, yes you are right. I mentioned the as I heard which was MAK2 
>>> but I think it is Mach ii.
>>>
>>> We would like to stay with Mach ii framework and make changes to 
>>> existing code, as we were told this will involve less work. Apparently, 
>>> moving away from Mach ii framework is going to involve a lot of work and 
>>> will be complicated. Again, this is after my discussion with one of the CF 
>>> developers who looked at this. 
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Omer
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, August 18, 2015 at 11:42:49 PM UTC+10, charlie arehart wrote:
>>>
>>>> Omer, some thoughts which may help you…
>>>>
>>>> Do you mean perhaps, “Mach ii”? That was a popular CFML framework for 
>>>> several years. I can appreciate that if you only heard its name spoken, 
>>>> you 
>>>> could think it was spelled “MAK2”. Just offering that if it may help you 
>>>> find more info (or people) to help with it.
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> Also, you say you want to “upgrade Cold Fusion and redevelop existing 
>>>> MAK2 framework code”. Do you mean you want to move the code away from that 
>>>> framework? Or just that you want to modify it while continuing to use it? 
>>>> Either would call for someone who does understand the framework, at least 
>>>> its use. 
>>>>
>>>> I’ll assume that you do NOT mean (by “redevelop existing framework 
>>>> code”) that you mean to modify the framework itself, right? That would 
>>>> take 
>>>> considerably more advanced skills.
>>>>
>>>> I will note that if you are moving from CF6 to CF11 (the latest 
>>>> supported edition), that is quite a leap. You’ll also want someone with 
>>>> enough experience to guide you through that transition, even if you just 
>>>> wanted to have the current code run in the new environment, let alone make 
>>>> modifications to that code.
>>>>
>>>> Hope that’s helpful.
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> /charlie
>>>>
>>>> PS Someone may want to point out to you also that CF is spelled without 
>>>> a space. That could also help you to know as you seek help, search for 
>>>> resources, etc.
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> *From:* cfau...@googlegroups.com [mailto:cfau...@googlegroups.com] *On 
>>>> Behalf Of *Omer Yafai
>>>> *Sent:* Monday, August 17, 2015 10:26 PM
>>>> *To:* cfaussie
>>>> *Subject:* [cfaussie] Looking for Cold Fusion and MAK2 Framework 
>>>> Developer
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> We have a internal company portal implemented using Cold Fusion 6.1.0.0 
>>>> version which is running off SQL 2000 with 2003 R2 OS. The code has been 
>>>> implemented using MAK2 framework. 
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> We are currently looking to upgrade Cold Fusion and redevelop existing 
>>>> MAK2 framework code to refine our internal portal, as we would like to 
>>>> make 
>>>> changes to it. 
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> We are located in Sydney CBD. If anyone can assist us with this then 
>>>> please reply to this post.
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>> Omer
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "cfaussie" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to cfaussie+u...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to cfau...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie.
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "cfaussie" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to cfaussie+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
>>> To post to this group, send email to cfau...@googlegroups.com 
>>> <javascript:>.
>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "cfaussie" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to cfaussie+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
>> To post to this group, send email to cfau...@googlegroups.com 
>> <javascript:>.
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Zac Spitzer
> +61 405 847 168
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"cfaussie" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to cfaussie+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to