I must have misunderstood then.
> And does that mean that you would not build up other functions and > methodologies to do other things that weren't originally > intended ? This, > in my opinion, is where the creativity lies in writing computer > applications. > > Just asking the question. Nope, that's not what it means, it just means, when you can something with the functions you have access to you should use them, that's all I meant by that. > Nothing that I do is a "hack" it is all deliberately planned > out given the > abilities and restrictions of the environment in which I have > to produce > an outcome. What others call a "Work Around" is simply > understanding the > limitations of the environment you are working with and > making do with > what you have got. I'm not saying anything you do is a hack, I was referring to my own experience, I know I used to work with quite some hacks here and there, and they always came back to haunt me. Until I realized I should tackle these things from a different perspective. > The CFMX language is not really XML > compliant in it's use of tags and attributes. You "work > around" these > limitations. Yeah - "work around".... Taco Fleur http://www.tacofleur.com/index/blog/ 0421 851 786 Tell me and I will forget Show me and I will remember Teach me and I will learn --- You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] MXDU2004 + Macromedia DevCon AsiaPac + Sydney, Australia http://www.mxdu.com/ + 24-25 February, 2004
