Yerp,

It basically keeps taking the first element out of the array, preloads it, then shifts that spot in the array (ie shift removes the first indx) until there are no more elements within the array itself).


--


Regards,
Scott Barnes
-
http://www.mossyblog.com
http://www.bestrates.com.au



Steve Onnis wrote:

Arr yes

but is it suposed to be always [0]?

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Scott
Barnes
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 1:12 PM
To: CFAussie Mailing List
Subject: [cfaussie] Re: JavaScript, Image, onLoad bug? I Challenge you
to fix this.




Steve Onnis wrote:



Scott

Just wanted to clarify something

////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
LoadScreen.prototype.preloadAssets = function(IsArrayFreshlNew) {

        if(!IsArrayFreshNew) {
                this.aAssetsToLoad.shift();
        }

        if(this.aAssetsToLoad.length <= 0) {
                this.aAssetsToLoad = new Array();
                return null;
        }

        var currentAsset = this.aAssetsToLoad[0];
        var oImage = new Image();

        oImage.controller = this;
        oImage.onload = this.onLoadAsset;
        oImage.id = currentAsset.id;
        oImage.src = currentAsset.uri;
}
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

this, to me doesnt look right


this.aAssetsToLoad[0].length looks like its always 0




No, its this.aAssetsToLoad.length ie no idea where
this.aAssetsToLoad[0].length comes into play ?


--


Regards,
Scott Barnes
-
http://www.mossyblog.com
http://www.bestrates.com.au

---
You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

MXDU2004 + Macromedia DevCon AsiaPac + Sydney, Australia
http://www.mxdu.com/ + 24-25 February, 2004




--- You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

MXDU2004 + Macromedia DevCon AsiaPac + Sydney, Australia
http://www.mxdu.com/ + 24-25 February, 2004

Reply via email to