Phil, Sorry about that ;o) I tossed up whether or not to use the word 'traditional'.
> I've read up a bit with OO, but unless it's forced upon me, I'll continue to > steer away from it. I suppose one of the strengths of CF is that it supports > differing design approaches. I think that is a very valid point. But that's all I've been trying to say all along - if you are going to do OO, learn OO. If not, don't worry about it man. Mark ------------------------------------------------------------------ E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: www.compoundtheory.com ICQ: 3094740 Quoting Phil Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I don't want to make out/come off as I'm some sort of OO/software > development guru, far from it. But I do > > have the benefit of coming from a traditional software development > background from University. > > Strewth - you lot are making me feel old. > When I went through uni I started off in 1981 with punch cards and cobol. > OO, the net and windows did not exist! > > I've read up a bit with OO, but unless it's forced upon me, I'll continue to > steer away from it. I suppose one of the strengths of CF is that it supports > differing design approaches. > > Cheers, > Phil. > > > --- > You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/ > > > --- You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/
