Paul Kenney wrote:
If you are familiar with OO and simply adore CFCs, check out the Mach-II framework at http://www.mach-ii.com. I like it a lot (as do many others)!
I was just talking to Barry B (sadly he has the misfortune of being next to me - i never shutup) about why i dislike Mach-II. He and I agree that with any methodology/framework, you dislike it for the simple fact you have no sense of ownership of it.
To me any framework/methodology you pickup, tends to either get mutated or followed blindly, and sometimes if you are lucky you get a nice balance between both, and for that i think is why i go against the grain and why i use batfink (atleast i saw it from the ground up in many ways).
I wonder if people who reply with "i use xyz" actually use the concept to the letter or cherry pick it ? even mach-ii :D
What other CFMX based methodologies/Frameworks are available? I only know of 3 so far:
- Mach-II - Benoramas MVC one - BatFink
What are the others? and who uses them?
Scott
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 14:59:57 +1000, Carl Vanderpal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello CFAussie,
just want to get some thoughts on the most common methodologies used by developers on this list, eg. FuseBox etc...
and what is the most widely adapted ones?
Thanks
Best regards, Carl Vanderpal Po Box 3462 Dural, NSW 2158 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/
--- You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/
