If you are going to all that trouble to 'move' the sql out of the CFC - why not just use stored procs?
Mark On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 10:17:28 +1000, Elliot Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What are you thinking Peter? - just keeping sql in separate file to the cfc > method body. > > Elliot Russo > > "Peter Tilbrook" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Um that possibly opens up severe database security issues (if the XML > > is tampered with). > > > > Why not let the DB server do the work as it is designed to? CF itself > > is NOT a database server remember. > > > > > > --- > You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/ > -- E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: www.compoundtheory.com ICQ: 3094740 --- You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/
