Just remember it should always be called "Application.cfm", not
application.cfm - same goes with OnRequestEnd.cfm. Why MM have stuck to this
after nine years is beyond me but that's the way it is.

Peter Tilbrook
Manager, ACT and Region ColdFusion Users Group - http://www.actcfug.com
4/73 Tharwa Road
Queanbeyan, NSW, 2620
AUSTRALIA

Telephone: +61-2-6284-2727
Mobile: +61-0439-401-823
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Taco Fleur
Sent: Tuesday, 21 September 2004 5:19 PM
To: CFAussie Mailing List
Subject: [cfaussie] Re: Include application.cfm

Robin,

I don't like the way you think at all!! ;-)) To much like the way I think
(in this case anyway), its actually sort of like I have it, but *slightly*
different.


Taco Fleur

Tell me and I will forget
Show me and I will remember
Teach me and I will learn 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robin 
> Hilliard
> Sent: Tuesday, 21 September 2004 3:56 PM
> To: CFAussie Mailing List
> Subject: [cfaussie] Re: Include application.cfm
> 
> 
> Taco,
> 
> No problem, I do it often. Two random thoughts about this:
> 
> - I put my base application.cfm in the directory above my webroot - 
> it's possible this way to build a cf application with no actual cf 
> code under the webroot if you want to take it to the extreme.  All you 
> need under the webroot are empty files with cfm extensions for each 
> browseable url.
>   All your code can be off under your cfmappings, called from some 
> front controller logic in application.cfm.  Good for security, not 
> saying this is at all a best practice but knowing it's possible can 
> change the way you think about structuring your apps.
> 
> - Sometimes I think of the directory hierachy as a class hierachy of 
> request types, with application.cfm as an init method for that 
> "subclass" of request.  Including the parent application.cfm is like 
> calling super.init().  Following that analogy you should probably make 
> it a rule to always call the parent application.cfm first - it's 
> required in OO languages, so someone's run into whatever happens if 
> you don't.
> 
> Food for thought anyway.
> 
> Robin
> http://www.rocketboots.com.au
> 
> 
> Taco Fleur wrote:
> 
> > Any reason not to include application.cfm in another
> application.cfm?
> >  
> > Currently I have something like:
> >  
> > web/application.cfm
> > web/object/application.cfm
> > web/object/function/application
> 
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/
> 


---
You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To
unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/





---
You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/

Reply via email to