Thanks for that explanation Sean. I didnt know JRUN was different in the different versions of CFMX.
However it happens that it's definitely the Enterprise version we're running in this case, so we're still looking for the reason the JRUN administrator isnt opening, and what do to about it. To recap for those coming in late to this story .... We want to run a non-CF app using JRUN, and therefore want to have another instance of JRUN going on the server. When we do a Netstat, we can see that the JRUN administrator is listening on port 8000. Opening the JRUN launcher shows that administrator is running on port 8000. But we can't open the JRUN administrator. When we try, we get a browser message saying the page cannot be displayed. Any other ideas anyone? Cheers Mike Kear Windsor, NSW, Australia AFP Webworks http://afpwebworks.com .com,.net,.org domains from AUD$20/Year On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 08:24:19 -0700, Sean Corfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 19:17:56 +1000, Mike Kear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I"m not sure Sean (not at that office until tomorrow). I know we > > have both versions for different situations and I'm not sure which is > > being used now for this exercise. > > > > Why does it make a difference? > > Enterprise has a full version of JRun (where I would expect the admin > to work), Server has a limited version of JRun (where I would not > expect the admin to work). > > That's just my guess - I don't have a copy of Server to test this (I > only ever run the J2EE version). > -- > Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/ > Team Fusebox -- http://www.fusebox.org/ > Got Gmail? -- I have 2 invites > > "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." > -- Margaret Atwood > --- You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/
