I'm over it, you'll continue to push the point until you're satisfied you've won. That's the thing with you, you keep going on and on and on, and never know when to shut the [profane word] up. The amount of crap that used to come my way because you shared the same work domain as me, would blow your mind and others. You seem to never get along with "people" on lists, if its not this one, it's others (ie Shado list...) point is your never [profane happy] until you "come up" with the solution, like you've just pioneered something significant that we can all rest now, knowing Taco was our man.
Come to think of it, I've not yet heard you once say a good thing about someone else's code. If you didn't write it, its was [profane word], pure and simple that's your level of arrogance. > I'm a newbie to OO too, although I understood many of the concepts before I > could give it the fancy name Inheritance, encapsulation, or polymorphism - > you don't need to know all those words to know OO.. So what? I hate it when > people are on the list throwing all these fancy words that they know most of > the people don't understand anyway, makes 'm look cool, and we are to help > are we? That paragraph alone illustrates the cretin (new word for ya, made it up special like) you are..... Fancy words.... *sigh*... Once again, you're attacking people on the list? (well basically anyone whos' communicated via OOP terminology that is...sorry, am did that word confuse you aswell?...heh...) That paragraph also shows the contempt you have for people on this list who discuss anything above your grasp, instead of taking time to look them up maybe? or even readup on OOP some more? If someone doesn't get what "Encapsulation" means in terms of CFMX, ask? ....I'd respect someone more for asking a "newbie" question like that, more then someone who assumes they understand it. I've asked it a few times, even though i grasped it, but i'd wanted to make sure i infact...grasp it.. your ego prevents you from doing such, thus you make comments like the one above. Not saying i'm better then you..nah [profane word] i am... Scott. (I'm sure everyone's over reading this [ expletive beep], but you'll want the last word - as usual, so be my guest). [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/10/2004 02:20:33 PM: > > I'll be blunt, > > Well if we are going to be blunt.. > > > You need to chill out more. > > I don't think you can meet anyone that chills out more than I do.. But you > can't see that in an email ;-)) > > > The problem with this whole topic has been, you didn't get an > > immediate > > answer from a problem that you liked, not only that the > > proposed method of > > attack you have outlined in many ways just doesn't hold > > water, in that its > > not a typical every day solution that you would face in OOP > > (before you > > start counter-arguments on CFMX and OOP read on). > > See, making assumptions and doing the twisting again, where exactly did I > say I was worried about not getting an answer? > What I was worried about was you fooling around.. > > Tell me exactly which part of my method of attack does not hold water? I > found a solution to super.init( argumentsCollection = arguments ) a solution > that no one since the last time I started this thread has been able to > solve. Yeah, uh, well I do believe this is what the whole thread has been > about (I should now because I started it), but that went right by you huh > Scott? You didn't get it huh? > > > Then after all this, you decide to then go an make a smart > > ass comment > > about not only myself and others who are on this list that "ramble on > > about OO" and yet don't understand it. You gotta learn to pick your > > battles and when to walk away, as you come off too aggressive > > and looking > > like an idiot. > > Well the word everyone was actually YOU, but I didn't want to make you feel > to bad.. And nobody else took offense by it, so.. Now who's the [profane > word] [profane word] and [profane word].. > > > At anyrate, dislike me or not, really doesn't make a > > difference to me, but > > don't assume to understand my skills or skillset just because > > i found your > > personal dilemma frustrating. The reason i found it > > frustrating as it goes > > against everything I have *actually* learned about OOP. I > > don't pretend to > > assume that i'm the god of OOP, hell i'm still learning and > > unlike you, > > i'm open to new concepts put forth. I've not had the X number > > of years of > > OOP background as some people on this list (ie Sean, Gary etc). > > It's a problem, in real life you are actually not hat bad, when you don't > talk. > Assuming, twisting and pulling other people in who I did not even mention, > yeah go on.. > You touched my skillset before I touched yours.. > > > I like the word Monkey, because its a funny term (whether you > > or others > > agree is another topic) and its a term commonly used when i > > was at TQ, and > > habits die hard. When I call someone a Code Monkey it means, > > you aren't a > > moron, quite the opposite your at a level of "coding" > > respect. If i call > > you a newbie, then you can take issue with it...thats the > > whole "Monkey" > > definition/glossary of terms. > > I like how you like the word monkey, because you are a monkey.. > Where did the CodeMonkey come into this conversation, creating some > composition are we, or inheritance Scott "is a"? > > > While CFMX is a totally different discipline and maybe thats > > the biggest > > struggle most of us face, in that making CFMX into an OOP > > ruleset when in > > fact it doesn't have to be, yet we can't quite seem to let > > that go... its > > only taken me the last couple of months, to realise that > > making CFMX into > > this Strict Coding Language is a waste of time, as it breaks a lot of > > rules and doesn't adhere to ones i like. I'm still learning > > JAVA & C#, so > > in many ways I'm still a newbie to OOP and i'll happilly admit that. > > I never slag CFMX of never, so where did that come from? > I'm a newbie to OO too, although I understood many of the concepts before I > could give it the fancy name Inheritance, encapsulation, or polymorphism - > you don't need to know all those words to know OO.. So what? I hate it when > people are on the list throwing all these fancy words that they know most of > the people don't understand anyway, makes 'm look cool, and we are to help > are we? > > > At anyrate, point is you come off too aggressive and depsite the list > > being a supposed "help for the CFMXer downunder" its not here > > waiting for > > "Taco's problem of the day", we all have jobs/priorities of > > our own, and > > those of us who do post on here to *try* and help others, > > whether we are > > right/wrong we still donate our time and energy in helping..aswell as > > prooving to ourselves concepts we have floating around in our > > noggins is > > infact right. Its good to problem solve, but its only as good as the > > person who has the problem, in that if you start > > counter-acting peoples > > intentions with a negative attitude, your gonna find yourself > > caught in a > > thread like this one. > > Yes, so what, I don't see what it has got to do with anything, is this from > another post again or something? The only person I counteract is you, I have > to otherwise my problem would turn into a giant disaster, ooh sjeesh it just > did (guess I did not counteract you to good, wait it's ignoring that I > should do when it comes to you, forgot).. > I don't expect anyone to answer, and I don't get upset if no one answers, I > might throw the question in the list again, or reformat the question and > throw it in again, or even months later throw it in again, but I don't get > pissed off, I don't understand where all this is coming from? Yeah you piss > me off, but that's about it. > > > Nothing personal, but in future, i'll just butt out of your > > threads, as > > its quite clear we both don't get along CFMX wise. > > Scott, that's is the most sensible thing you ever said, to be honest, I am > not going to miss you one bit, I never found any help in your posts anyway, > same thing when you talk (I'm not the only one who thinks that either ;-).. > > > Scott Out. > > > > P,S > > Everytime you post a negative flamewar on a list, Taco Kills a > > monkey. Think > > on that. > > > > P.S.S > > Everytime I post on here, thats less $$ in my pocket (even > > now, this email > > cost me $0.15), I'm saying people owe me for it, I'm saying be > > mindful in > > contract roles, time is money and if I or others take time to > > help others > > via this list, be aware they are basically paying for the > > right to help > > you/others. > > just doing what scott is good at ;-)) > > And you still spend 15 minutes on writing this post?? > > I'm glad you wanted to continue this flamewar, at least now I was able to > say what I wanted to say. > > Well I have said all I could say, if you want to take this any further, why > not do it privately? > > > --- > You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/ To unsubscribe from this email please forward this email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] If this communication is not intended for you and you are not an authorised recipient of this email you are prohibited by law from dealing with or relying on the email or any file attachments. This prohibition includes reading, printing, copying, re-transmitting, disseminating, storing or in any other way dealing or acting in reliance on the information. If you have received this email in error, we request you contact ABN AMRO Morgans Limited immediately by returning the email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and destroy the original. We will refund any reasonable costs associated with notifying ABN AMRO Morgans. This email is confidential and may contain privileged client information. ABN AMRO Morgans has taken reasonable steps to ensure the accuracy and integrity of all its communications, including electronic communications, but accepts no liability for materials transmitted. Materials may also be transmitted without the knowledge of ABN AMRO Morgans. ABN AMRO Morgans Limited its directors and employees do not accept liability for the results of any actions taken or not on the basis of the information in this report. ABN AMRO Morgans Limited and its associates hold or may hold securities in the companies/trusts mentioned herein. Any recommendation is made on the basis of our research of the investment and may not suit the specific requirements of clients. Assessments of suitability to an individuals portfolio can only be made after an examination of the particular clients investments, financial circumstances and requirements. ABN AMRO Morgans Limited (ABN 49 010 669 726 AFSL 235410) A Participant of ASX Group --- You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/
