Or 

<cfif condition="x GT y">
...
</cfif>

which is more consistent...

Darryl

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07/12/2004 08:54:43 AM:

> > If cfscript was made ECMA compliant, how would the tag-based operators 

> > work ?
> > 
> > <cfif x > y >
> > 
> > </cfif>
> > 
> > ?? im sure that isnt valid xml.
> > 
> 
> Actually, I'll go one step further.. For that to be valid XML it would 
> probably have to look more like this:
> 
> <cfif expression="x GT y">
> ...
> </cfif>
> 
> Darryl
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from this email please forward this email to 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> 
> This email message is confidential and may be privileged. If you are
> not the intended recipient
> please forward the email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and delete 
> the original.
> 
> ABN AMRO Morgans Limited and its associates hold or may hold 
> securities in the companies/trusts mentioned herein.
> Any general advice included in this email has been prepared without 
> taking into account your objectives, financial situation or needs.
> Before acting on the advice, you should consider its appropriateness
> or discuss with one of our investment advisors.
> 
> ABN AMRO Morgans Limited (ABN 49 010 669 726 AFSL 235410) A 
> Participant of ASX Group.
> A principal member of the Financial Planning Association.
> 
> 
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/


---
You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [email protected]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/

Reply via email to