On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 14:18:46 +1100, grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> and there are a couple of ways of creating generic objects - but
> typically the object has to be done a certain way to integrate with
> other objects. adding items to a datagrid is a good example -
> addItem() takes an object, but i found that if you pass the object as
> addItem({field:value,etc.}) it wouldn't render. object["field"] =
> value; addItem(object) worked. I spent a lot of time working that out.
>
> stuff like that smells of beta.
>
Agreed, v2 framework bites... :) but you'r confusing that with Flash itself.
Everyone knows the v2 Framework has its share of problems alone. That
being said, flash technology itself has nothing to do with it.. its
like saying Coldfusion is beta-ware because of Mach-II? - try the V1
Framework instead or even ghostwire.com etc. ( I have personally
cherry picked the good parts of v2 framework and threw the rest
away)...
(why am i defending flash so much today..its pissing me off as i speak
and i'm defending it..... anyone know how to make a Connector link
find the closest N,S,W,E face on a shape..ie making a cutdown version
of Visio...fun).
--
Regards,
Scott Barnes
http://www.mossyblog.com
---
You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [email protected]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/
