Sounds strangely like assuming to me. Chad
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Scott Sent: Tuesday, 1 March 2005 4:30 PM To: CFAussie Mailing List Subject: [cfaussie] Re: CFCs calling CFCs Daryl, Yeah it did a little, but I would have thought that if I had looked at Mach-II that it would be obvious that one would be aware of the memory that method would use. Regards Andrew Scott Technical Consultant NuSphere Pty Ltd Level 2/33 Bank Street South Melbourne, Victoria, 3205 Phone: 03 9686 0485 - Fax: 03 9699 7976 -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darryl Lyons Sent: Tuesday, 1 March 2005 4:24 PM To: CFAussie Mailing List Subject: [cfaussie] Re: CFCs calling CFCs > Thanks for pointing out what I already knew. That came across as very rude - whether it was implied or not. People can't read your mind... If you ask questions you've got to accept that you will get all manner of responses - stuff you know already and stuff you don't. Darryl --- You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/ --- You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [email protected] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/
